- defining the self via externals or internals;
- making perceptions using intuition or sensation;
- making judgements using thinking or feeling ;
- preferring making decisions to making perceptions.
The theory is quite powerful, and does allow the individual to begin a foray into that classical objective of "Know thyself". It is but only one theoretical way, and the big danger for anyone using MBTi is that they get their four letters and are told that this is their personality type with which they were born and is somehow immutable. The temptation is to assume that one cannot change preferences, although an introvert can "learn" to become extravert et c. The implication is that once an ENFP, always an ENFP at heart.
It is one thing to know oneself, and a good thing too, but this is one of the root causes of the malady that is afflicting the Church of England. In the past, people were content with coming to church and saying the Mass as it was constructed by the church. However, it is the result of this "Know Thyself" phenomenon that people are now saying that they "cannot" do Mass in the traditional way because the Mass is geared to introverts and not extraverts or some such like. People object to the traditional Mass because it doesn't fit them.
Laziness!
It's sheer laziness. Rather than work at finding away of relating with the Mass, which is after all an engagement of the human personality with that of the divine, these folk demand that the Church changes its liturgy, its prayers, its expressions to fit all people. And the Church of England, in its desire to upset noone but to facilitate the notion of "meeting the people where they are" change the traditions to suit. It's never engaged with society on this level before, why should it have suddenly done so inthe 20th Century. Philosophies of the self have existed long before Freud, Jung, and MBTi, why suddenly engage with the individual now and thus run the ship off course?
This "priesthood of all believers" oft quoted by liberals to supplant the Catholic notion of priesthood is that the layfolk go out into the world and live Christian lives through which the world might see the Light of Christ. Then, having worked long and hard at this coal-face, they find nourishment from the Mass that has been celebrated in the same way since time immemorial.
"Boring!" say the ENTPs (to stereotype a type(!)), " I want a Mass that suits me, that changes every week, that engages my extraverted ideas." If it suits you, O stereotyped ENTP, then how will the same Mass suit an ISFJ? "Oh, they can have their own Mass." So how is the Mass a sacrament of Unity if you won't attend the same Mass as your INFJ neighbour? "Well, it's the same God that we worship, the Mass is still the same." Well, no it isn't - you are not there, effectively, though not in jurisdiction, you are creating another congregation. The Masses will still be valid in the eyes of both ENTP and ISFJ, but there is still an excommunication this time along the fault-line of personality - more purification, more diluted ethnic cleansing.
No, ENTP and INFJ should go to the same Mass and work hard to engage their selves into the traditional liturgies, and the Church should not have indulged them. Back to the Traditional Mass we should go.
"Why? Isn't that just an expression of your personality? Isn't that your preference, O thou self-righteous INTJ?" My preference is immaterial. My desire to serve God is that which is universal to all Christians. If the Catholic Church instituted and used a Mass largely unchanged for centuries (indeed, totally unchanged in the Orthodox Tradition) then it was adequate for all types of person regardless of who, where and when they are. The Traditional Mass is a lingua franca across Time displaying the Sacrament of Unity across the Ages. No matter who you are or where you are in the world, you could walk into Mass and be assured that it is the same Sacrament.
"But you're using your preference of intuition when you say that."
No, I'm stating a fact voiced by St Vincent of Lerins that the Catholic Faith is quod ubique, quod semper, quod ab omnibus creditum est. (that which is believed everywhere, always and by all). If there is no link with the theology of the past, then there is no Catholic Faith.
Now, O argumentative ENTP, go out into the world and minister to it as the Christian that you are using all your personality as God has given you. Pray to God in your own offices, in your own manner, but when you come to Mass, be prepared to celebrate it with all people in the Traditional way. Engage with it in your own way by all means, but don't force that way upon others. If you are bored, then that's your challenge, not a problem with the Liturgy.
How might I carry on this conversation with another personality type?
3 comments:
Well, in the first place, I look upon faddish psychological "tools" with a VERY skeptical eye. I tend not to believe that the Myers-Briggs so-called Indicator really indicates anything worth consideration, and that it is about as far from a powerful tool for self-understanding as one can get. Such systems, in my experience, are worse than useless in the practice, teaching, and propagation of Christianity.
My previous church (Independent Evangelical/charismatic) had begun to make considerable use of this and allied systems of pigeonholing people. It was at that point that it began to lose sight the supernatural mission of leading souls into the incomprehensible presence of God, and instead to substitute a theraputic model. It was also at that point that I began to realize that the spirit (my spirit) needed something the changeable and faddish Evangelical atmosphere could not supply.
Traditional liturgy does indeed change over time, but in a gradual and organic manner. Even the Orthodox Liturgy has changed, and does exhibit local variations, but, in a truly Catholic environment one is protected from sudden change and faddishness. This is a principle being lost sight of in much of contemporary Christianity, even in the historic bastion of Catholic Conervatism, the Roman Church.
To make radical changes in order to please some personalities is invariably to exclude more souls than are being reached, and to divide the Church into countless little pieces. This is sin, if it be plainly labeled, representing an attempt to worship man and his needs rather than calling him to conform himself to the only real object of worship.
How can I present this to various 'personality types'? I can't. I can only present it to individual human souls with whom I have opened conversation as another human being -- not as a 'type'.
There! I may have gotten a lot of people angry with me now.
ed
A few Christmases ago my family enjoyed the Meyers-Brigg stuff as a parlor game! We monitored one another playfully to make sure everyone gave honest answers in the quizzes. Once everyone had their results we all got to argue over how accurate we thought our own results and everyone else's were. We enjoyed ourselves precisely because everyone was different and we were enjoying being together while taking notice of our differences. To make those results the basis for Liturgical sectarianism is a tragic thought indeed. Not only would it split Christianity further, along personality lines, but it would also split between those who wanted to use the Myers-Briggs and those who wanted to use other criteria.
My priest often talks about the Church as being "authentic" which is related to "original" and "authoritative" but is also a synonym for "real" and "genuine." I think that's a useful guideline concerning variations in customs...
Oh wow!
We INTPs demand our own bishop!
There is no way we could even begin to relate to an EFSJ bishop. It's inconceivable.
Post a Comment