Why generosity in engaging with others is an act of love.
Monday, October 12, 2026
Sunday, October 11, 2026
Minding the open book
Sermon preached at the Cathedral Church of St Augustine of Canterbury on the nineteenth Sunday after Trinity
Tubbo the Clown
is performing at Mia's party.
He gives Mia's mummy
a pack of cards
and asks her to pick a card
memorise it
and put it
back in the pack
without telling him.
After some over theatrical
moans and groans,
waving of hands
and a rubber chicken,
Tubbo says,
"eight of diamonds!"
"Yes!" exclaims Mia's mummy
Cue much applause
and bowing and tripping over
big clown shoes.
How does he do it?
Can Tubbo really
read minds?
[PAUSE]
The more sceptical of us
might suggest that
he can't.
We would probably say
that he is using
a rigged deck of cards.
He might be using
the reflection
in Mia's mummy's glasses.
Or perhaps,
he is using some
deep psychological trick.
[PAUSE,]
Mind reading acts
these days
rely on careful observation
of a person.
Knowing how
people act normally
and how they react
unconsciously to
various events,
can give a gifted observer
a good idea of what
people are thinking.
Just subtle little mannerisms
can expose to an eagle-eye
what we are thinking.
Poker players call these
little signs 'tells'
because they use them to
tell if someone is bluffing.
We're very used to this
with the people closest to us.
"That face" on a parent
usually means
that you have done something wrong.
[PAUSE]
What, then, are we to make
of Our Lord
knowing the thoughts
of the scribes
who are watching Him
heal a man with the palsy.
Is this an act of mind reading,
or has He seen "that face"
on the scribes
when He forgives
the paralysed man
his sins.
Do the scribes
have a "tell"?
We can understand
if this is the case.
We can see the sneers,
the raised eyebrows,
the hands balling
into fists.
And we can tell
that they are taking issue
with Our Lord's authority
to forgive sins.
We don't need to read minds
to know what they are thinking.
So perhaps Our Lord
isn't a mind reader at all.
Except...
[PAUSE]
He is.
But the minds being read
aren't just
the minds of the scribes.
Right at the beginning,
all we see is a paralysed man
being brought to
Our Lord by friends.
We see their faith in Jesus.
What we don't see
is that the man
needs forgiveness
in order to be healed.
Our Lord is the first to admit
that not every illness
is the result of sin.
But equally,
some illnesses
might be the result
of sin.
How does Our Lord know
that forgiving this man's sin
will heal him?
[PAUSE]
Our Lord knows his thoughts.
And He knows the thoughts
of the scribes.
He knows our thoughts
because He knows us.
He knows our "tells".
He knows our triggers.
He knows our deepest
darkest thoughts.
Got a deep dark secret?
Sonething you want
to keep hidden?
Something which would
mortify you if someone else knows?
Well, sorry,
Our Lord knows it.
Does that make you
uncomfortable?
Why?
[PAUSE]
If God knows our shame,
why is that a problem?
What we see here in front of us,
is a God Who doesn't raise
His eyebrows,
doesn't tut-tut,
doesn't condemn,
but seeks to heal.
He wants to make us better.
He wants to forgive our sins.
But we need to come to Him
or be carried to Him
in order to find
the healing of our souls
through the forgiveness
of our sins.
We are sinners.
We know that
and we have a tendency
to scold others
or sneer at others
or avoid others
because of their sins.
But God is not like that.
And He doesn't want us to be like that.
This is why priests
cannot reveal
what is told them in confession.
God wants us
to confess to Him
and not be ashamed
of coming to confession.
We should be ashamed
of sinning.
We should not be ashamed
of repenting
of confessing
of wanting to be healed.
Because God is not
ashamed of creating us
as the Incarnation,
Death and Resurrection
proves in spades.
[PAUSE]
God reads our minds
because He knows us.
The converse is also true.
If we know God,
we know His mind too.
We can read the Mind of God
if we choose to.
But that means a life of
searching for Him
and seeking His "tell"
which can only be found
in the Word of God.
Monday, October 05, 2026
Sunday, October 04, 2026
Thank God for chicken sandwiches!
Sermon for harvest festival
How much is
a chicken sandwich,
these days?
Would you buy one for £1?
Okay if it's one of
Mrs Miggins' sandwiches
at a fundraising lunch,
but not if it's from
Scabby Joe's cart
behind the bins at Tesco's.
£2?
£5?
£10?
That would have
to be a good one!
What about $1500?
Would you buy
a chicken sandwich
for $1500?
[PAUSE]
What's it made from?
Bread made
at the hands of 1000 dusky maidens
(or handsome young men,
if you prefer)?
Chicken directly descended
from the court of Henry VIII?
Butter from
the real Ermintrude the Cow
from the Magic Roundabout?
But a chicken sandwich
does cost $1500
and this has been proved.
[PAUSE]
A man
- a youtuber -
has shown that
the cost of making
a chicken sandwich
from scratch costs
that amount of money.
He bought the wheat,
sowed it,
grew it,
did all that farmers do
to make it grow
into normal wheat.
He reared
and killed a chicken,
himself.
He made the butter
from a cow he milked himself.
He even added
all the sweetners
and preservatives
that go into a chicken sandwich.
All this cost him $1500.
What does this tell you?
[PAUSE]
We rely so much
on the labour of others
for the fact that
we can go to the fridge,
take out a chicken sandwich
and eat it
without sparing a single thought
for all the work
that has gone into
getting that sandwich
into our fridge in the first place.
And then we moan
when we have to go to work.
[PAUSE]
We see here
the sheer complexity
that forms our economy.
No longer are we
subsistence farmers
eking out a meagre existence
through days of back-breaking labour
in order to have
only just enough
to eat in the evening.
But our labour is hard, today.
We still have to worry about
getting enough money
in our pockets in order
to put food on the table.
That worry is not just
in terms of physical produce,
but streams of
data, cashflow
and numbercrunching.
And, as we are finding
in our sophisticated digital age,
whatever we produce
is still not immune
from the effects of
the weather, war or robbery.
And we worry.
We become anxious
about the work we do,
whether it's enough,
whether we can cope
with the demands made on us
for our labour.
As good Christians,
we bring our worries
and the worries of the world
to God.
And what does God say?
[PAUSE]
He shows us lilies
and sparrows.
"Ah! It's alright for Him,
He doesn't need to eat.
He can just magic up some food!"
"Why doesn't He magic up
some food
for us all?"
These folk have missed the point.
It is our labour together
that means that chicken sandwiches
do not cost $1500.
If we choose to invest our work
with the work of others
then we reap the rewards
which we can share.
Our labour is not worth nothing.
It certainly is not worth nothing to God.
[PAUSE]
Work became hard for us at the Fall.
God did not arbitrarily curse us
with hard labour
when we ate of the fruit
from the tree of knowledge
of good and evil.
We effectively cursed ourselves
by injecting laziness,
cheating,
fraud,
corner-cutting,
avarice and theft
into our work.
How much of our work exists
just in order
to protect ourselves
from each other?
[PAUSE]
And God shows us sparrows
to remind us that
He does care and,
if we seek Him
and His righteousness first,
we will have more than we need.
He shows us lilies
to remind us that
His Creation is beautiful
and,
perhaps,
we should bask
in its beauty so as
to want to work
to keep it nice.
God gives us motivation
to invest our labour in His creation
for love of Him,
and that He promises
what the world cannot
- a huge return on
that investment.
Often,
our attitude to labour
needs careful and serious review.
Here,
at our harvest festival,
such as it is,
we give thanks to God
for His goodness
in providing the harvest
as well as blessing those
who gathered that harvest.
This is right and proper.
But do we see
the part we play in that harvest?
Is there a part we should play
in that harvest?
Monday, September 28, 2026
Sunday, September 27, 2026
Entitled to High Church?
Sermon for the seventeenth Sunday after Trinity
They say that a bad tenor is a form of piracy, being murder on the high Cs.
Why do we think that one note is higher than another? It's not as if we can see them - they are sounds, not sights. Yes, indeed, we may write notes as being higher or lower on the page, but why not left or right? Do we think that one note is higher than another because of how they are written, or is it something else?
[PAUSE]
It's interesting that different cultures have thought of notes as being high or low regardless of how they write the music down. Many think that it's because of where the notes feel in the body as you sing them. Low notes are in the belly and take less effort. High notes feel in the head and take more effort.
Indeed, it is the sense of effort that makes us think of climbing a ladder. Walking uphill takes more effort than walking down.
You might now look and see why we're often called "High Church". We go to a lot of effort in decorating our churches and in the way in which we perform our liturgy. Low Church has a simple table with a white cloth. High Church has the Big Six on the altar with an appropriate frontal. The more ornate, the more effort, the higher church.
Low Church tend to put their effort into words and interior contemplation. High Church tend to put their effort into the decoration and engaging the senses. There is room for both.
To be high up in anything requires effort and people indeed put in the effort so that they can go up higher. The trouble comes when people think two rather pernicious things. They first think that their efforts entitle them to the high places, the best positions, the ring-side seats. They then think that, because they are in the high places, the best positions and the ring-side seats, they must be better than those who aren't.
And that's the problem.
[PAUSE]
Our Lord presents us with a wedding with lots of rooms. These days, we think of tables at the wedding breakfast. The better tables are those closest to the bride and groom.
If the Archbishop were to come in and demand a seat between Bridegroom and Bride just because he is the Archbishop, we know that something is wrong.
The archbishop would be entitled to sit in the top place here and now, because he is the Archbishop and his high office would entitle him to take this position. His effort and position means that he has authority here.
But a wedding isn't like that. "High" and "Low" at a wedding don't mean the same as "High" and "Low" in church authority. To think that because we have a high position in one way, doesn't mean that we have a high position in every way. We cannot presume on our sense of entitlement.
Our Lord is demonstrating the danger of presuming entitlement which effectively comes from worshipping entitlement.
And people do worship entitlement.
[PAUSE]
Some people seem to think that, just because they have put the effort in to achieve something, doesn't mean that they are entitled to have that achievement recognised universally.
Some people seem to think that, just because they think they have put the effort in to achieve something, doesn't mean that they are entitled to have that achievement recognised universally.
It doesn't work like that.
High Mass is as valid as Low Mass. What matters is how we approach the sacrament.
At the wedding feast, it's not what you have achieved that determines your place, it's your relationship with the bride and groom.
And the Wedding Feast of the Lamb is no different.
Those who believe that they entitled to sit in the higher room will be disappointed.
Those whom the Bride and Bridegroom recognise will be invited to go up higher.
[PAUSE]
The more we value Jesus, the less we value the entitlements of this life. The more we learn to approach Him in reverence at His altar, and the more we learn to take Him away with us in our hearts, in our minds and in our lives, the less we need for the trappings of pride and reputation.
We are entitled to Heaven, but only through the love of Christ.
Monday, September 21, 2026
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
