What is the Atonement in Anglican Catholic thought?
Monday, October 05, 2026
Sunday, October 04, 2026
Thank God for chicken sandwiches!
Sermon for harvest festival
How much is
a chicken sandwich,
these days?
Would you buy one for £1?
Okay if it's one of
Mrs Miggins' sandwiches
at a fundraising lunch,
but not if it's from
Scabby Joe's cart
behind the bins at Tesco's.
£2?
£5?
£10?
That would have
to be a good one!
What about $1500?
Would you buy
a chicken sandwich
for $1500?
[PAUSE]
What's it made from?
Bread made
at the hands of 1000 dusky maidens
(or handsome young men,
if you prefer)?
Chicken directly descended
from the court of Henry VIII?
Butter from
the real Ermintrude the Cow
from the Magic Roundabout?
But a chicken sandwich
does cost $1500
and this has been proved.
[PAUSE]
A man
- a youtuber -
has shown that
the cost of making
a chicken sandwich
from scratch costs
that amount of money.
He bought the wheat,
sowed it,
grew it,
did all that farmers do
to make it grow
into normal wheat.
He reared
and killed a chicken,
himself.
He made the butter
from a cow he milked himself.
He even added
all the sweetners
and preservatives
that go into a chicken sandwich.
All this cost him $1500.
What does this tell you?
[PAUSE]
We rely so much
on the labour of others
for the fact that
we can go to the fridge,
take out a chicken sandwich
and eat it
without sparing a single thought
for all the work
that has gone into
getting that sandwich
into our fridge in the first place.
And then we moan
when we have to go to work.
[PAUSE]
We see here
the sheer complexity
that forms our economy.
No longer are we
subsistence farmers
eking out a meagre existence
through days of back-breaking labour
in order to have
only just enough
to eat in the evening.
But our labour is hard, today.
We still have to worry about
getting enough money
in our pockets in order
to put food on the table.
That worry is not just
in terms of physical produce,
but streams of
data, cashflow
and numbercrunching.
And, as we are finding
in our sophisticated digital age,
whatever we produce
is still not immune
from the effects of
the weather, war or robbery.
And we worry.
We become anxious
about the work we do,
whether it's enough,
whether we can cope
with the demands made on us
for our labour.
As good Christians,
we bring our worries
and the worries of the world
to God.
And what does God say?
[PAUSE]
He shows us lilies
and sparrows.
"Ah! It's alright for Him,
He doesn't need to eat.
He can just magic up some food!"
"Why doesn't He magic up
some food
for us all?"
These folk have missed the point.
It is our labour together
that means that chicken sandwiches
do not cost $1500.
If we choose to invest our work
with the work of others
then we reap the rewards
which we can share.
Our labour is not worth nothing.
It certainly is not worth nothing to God.
[PAUSE]
Work became hard for us at the Fall.
God did not arbitrarily curse us
with hard labour
when we ate of the fruit
from the tree of knowledge
of good and evil.
We effectively cursed ourselves
by injecting laziness,
cheating,
fraud,
corner-cutting,
avarice and theft
into our work.
How much of our work exists
just in order
to protect ourselves
from each other?
[PAUSE]
And God shows us sparrows
to remind us that
He does care and,
if we seek Him
and His righteousness first,
we will have more than we need.
He shows us lilies
to remind us that
His Creation is beautiful
and,
perhaps,
we should bask
in its beauty so as
to want to work
to keep it nice.
God gives us motivation
to invest our labour in His creation
for love of Him,
and that He promises
what the world cannot
- a huge return on
that investment.
Often,
our attitude to labour
needs careful and serious review.
Here,
at our harvest festival,
such as it is,
we give thanks to God
for His goodness
in providing the harvest
as well as blessing those
who gathered that harvest.
This is right and proper.
But do we see
the part we play in that harvest?
Is there a part we should play
in that harvest?
Monday, September 28, 2026
Sunday, September 27, 2026
Entitled to High Church?
Sermon for the seventeenth Sunday after Trinity
They say that a bad tenor is a form of piracy, being murder on the high Cs.
Why do we think that one note is higher than another? It's not as if we can see them - they are sounds, not sights. Yes, indeed, we may write notes as being higher or lower on the page, but why not left or right? Do we think that one note is higher than another because of how they are written, or is it something else?
[PAUSE]
It's interesting that different cultures have thought of notes as being high or low regardless of how they write the music down. Many think that it's because of where the notes feel in the body as you sing them. Low notes are in the belly and take less effort. High notes feel in the head and take more effort.
Indeed, it is the sense of effort that makes us think of climbing a ladder. Walking uphill takes more effort than walking down.
You might now look and see why we're often called "High Church". We go to a lot of effort in decorating our churches and in the way in which we perform our liturgy. Low Church has a simple table with a white cloth. High Church has the Big Six on the altar with an appropriate frontal. The more ornate, the more effort, the higher church.
Low Church tend to put their effort into words and interior contemplation. High Church tend to put their effort into the decoration and engaging the senses. There is room for both.
To be high up in anything requires effort and people indeed put in the effort so that they can go up higher. The trouble comes when people think two rather pernicious things. They first think that their efforts entitle them to the high places, the best positions, the ring-side seats. They then think that, because they are in the high places, the best positions and the ring-side seats, they must be better than those who aren't.
And that's the problem.
[PAUSE]
Our Lord presents us with a wedding with lots of rooms. These days, we think of tables at the wedding breakfast. The better tables are those closest to the bride and groom.
If the Archbishop were to come in and demand a seat between Bridegroom and Bride just because he is the Archbishop, we know that something is wrong.
The archbishop would be entitled to sit in the top place here and now, because he is the Archbishop and his high office would entitle him to take this position. His effort and position means that he has authority here.
But a wedding isn't like that. "High" and "Low" at a wedding don't mean the same as "High" and "Low" in church authority. To think that because we have a high position in one way, doesn't mean that we have a high position in every way. We cannot presume on our sense of entitlement.
Our Lord is demonstrating the danger of presuming entitlement which effectively comes from worshipping entitlement.
And people do worship entitlement.
[PAUSE]
Some people seem to think that, just because they have put the effort in to achieve something, doesn't mean that they are entitled to have that achievement recognised universally.
Some people seem to think that, just because they think they have put the effort in to achieve something, doesn't mean that they are entitled to have that achievement recognised universally.
It doesn't work like that.
High Mass is as valid as Low Mass. What matters is how we approach the sacrament.
At the wedding feast, it's not what you have achieved that determines your place, it's your relationship with the bride and groom.
And the Wedding Feast of the Lamb is no different.
Those who believe that they entitled to sit in the higher room will be disappointed.
Those whom the Bride and Bridegroom recognise will be invited to go up higher.
[PAUSE]
The more we value Jesus, the less we value the entitlements of this life. The more we learn to approach Him in reverence at His altar, and the more we learn to take Him away with us in our hearts, in our minds and in our lives, the less we need for the trappings of pride and reputation.
We are entitled to Heaven, but only through the love of Christ.
Monday, September 21, 2026
Saturday, September 19, 2026
Bishop Apparent
Sermon for the 18th anniversary of Consecration of Bishop Damien Mead
Mitre, purple cassock,
rochet, chimere, pectoral cross.
All items of apparel
exclusive to a bishop.
Why on earth would anyone
long to wear them?
And yet some people do.
[PAUSE]
Look out on the street,
and you see people walking about.
They don't tend to stand out.
Coats and hats,
hoodies and jeans,
smart suits and scruffy tracksuits.
But a man
coming down the street
in a cope and mitre
seems rather odd.
Conspicuous,
attention-grabbing,
silly.
The dress of a bishop
is distinctive
and indicative of
an authority
that comes down
through the ages.
It has a place
and that place is the church.
Indeed, where the people
gather around their bishop,
there is the Catholic Church.
The office of a bishop
is attractive to Christians
for this reason.
But can we be sure
that when we see
a man dressed as a bishop
that we see the Catholic Church?
[PAUSE]
Of course not!
An actor can dress as a bishop,
that doesn't mean that
he has the authority of a bishop.
Anyone,
man or woman,
can dress as a bishop
but only those who are truly
consecrated by the Church
are truly bishops.
And some people
long to dress as bishops
for that sense of authority
because they hope people
will listen to them
and give them some sense of respect.
These people
dress as bishops for themselves.
They desire the appearance
of a bishop,
not the office of a bishop.
[PAUSE]
St Paul tells us
that to desire the office of a bishop
is a good thing.
To want to do
what bishops do
is something holy.
But not all are called
to do that.
Only those whom
God calls
and the Church recognises
in keeping with the authority
and teaching she has received
from Christ.
The first bishops
did not look like bishops
but they were bishops
setting the pattern for ours today.
The distinctive dress
of bishops may develop
over the ages,
but all bishops
possess the same,
unchanging authority.
There is only One
Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church,
united across Time and Space,
and the bishops
are an integral ingredient
of what it means for
the Church to be
Apostolic.
[PAUSE]
And we have a bishop,
and we are gathered
around that bishop
in order to do what the Church
has always done.
At the hands of our bishop,
we offer the Sacrifice of the Mass,
the same sacrifice
that the Church has always offered,
and we receive at His hands
the true Body and Blood
of Our Lord Jesus Christ.
This makes us members
of that One, Holy, Catholic
and Apostolic Church.
[PAUSE]
Of courss,
there will always be those
who say that
we are actors.
They will say that
our bishop is playing dress-up -
cosplaying.
They will say
that we are not really
doing what we think we're doing.
They will say
that we do not
really have bishops
because we changed
what bishops are.
But we haven't!
What do they think
we are doing?
Cosplay!
Okay, but why?
For what reason?
Why are you here today?
Why is our bishop here today?
We are here
in faith
to worship God in our Lord Jesus Christ
and offer the sacrifice of the Mass
according to the rites of Holy Church
and we intend
to receive the Body and Blood of Christ.
Just as we intend
to consecrate bishops
according to
the One, Holy, Catholic
and Apostolic Church
through the grace of God.
That is our intention.
It has always been our intention,
through 1054,
through 1534,
through 1992.
"Ah, you might intend it,
but it's not really happening,
is it?"
God will judge our intentions
and not men.
We will not force people
to receive from our bishops.
We will not insist
that people accept our authority.
For Love does not insist
on His own way.
Let those who don't believe us
go their way in peace.
But as many as will have faith
and accept the ministry
and authority of our bishop,
these will receive
the fulness of
the One, Holy,.Catholic
and Apostolic Church.
[PAUSE]
And to our bishop
who does the office of a bishop
rather than just
looking like a bishop.
Thank you.
And
Thank God.
Monday, September 14, 2026
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
