Entitled to High Church?

Sermon for the seventeenth Sunday after Trinity

They say that a bad tenor is a form of piracy, being murder on the high Cs.

Why do we think that one note is higher than another? It's not as if we can see them - they are sounds, not sights. Yes, indeed, we may write notes as being higher or lower on the page, but why not left or right? Do we think that one note is higher than another because of how they are written, or is it something else?

[PAUSE]

It's interesting that different cultures have thought of notes as being high or low regardless of how they write the music down. Many think that it's because of where the notes feel in the body as you sing them. Low notes are in the belly and take less effort. High notes feel in the head and take more effort.

Indeed, it is the sense of effort that makes us think of climbing a ladder. Walking uphill takes more effort than walking down. 

You might now look and see why we're often called "High Church". We go to a lot of effort in decorating our churches and in the way in which we perform our liturgy. Low Church has a simple table with a white cloth. High Church has the Big Six on the altar with an appropriate frontal. The more ornate, the more effort, the higher church.

Low Church tend to put their effort into words and interior contemplation. High Church tend to put their effort into the decoration and engaging the senses. There is room for both.

To be high up in anything requires effort and people indeed put in the effort so that they can go up higher. The trouble comes when people think two rather pernicious things. They first think that their efforts entitle them to the high places, the best positions, the ring-side seats. They then think that, because they are in the high places, the best positions and the ring-side seats, they must be better than those who aren't.

And that's the problem.

[PAUSE]

Our Lord presents us with a wedding with lots of rooms. These days, we think of tables at the wedding breakfast. The better tables are those closest to the bride and groom.

If the Archbishop were to come in and demand a seat between Bridegroom and Bride just because he is the Archbishop, we know that something is wrong.

The archbishop would be entitled to sit in the top place here and now, because he is the Archbishop and his high office would entitle him to take this position. His effort and position means that he has authority here. 

But a wedding isn't like that. "High" and "Low" at a wedding don't mean the same as "High" and "Low" in church authority. To think that because we have a high position in one way, doesn't mean that we have a high position in every way. We cannot presume on our sense of entitlement.

Our Lord is demonstrating the danger of presuming entitlement which effectively comes from worshipping entitlement.

And people do worship entitlement.

[PAUSE]

Some people seem to think that, just because they have put the effort in to achieve something, doesn't mean that they are entitled to have that achievement recognised universally.

Some people seem to think that, just because they think they have put the effort in to achieve something, doesn't mean that they are entitled to have that achievement recognised universally.

It doesn't work like that.

High Mass is as valid as Low Mass. What matters is how we approach the sacrament.

At the wedding feast, it's not what you have achieved that determines your place, it's your relationship with the bride and groom.

And the Wedding Feast of the Lamb is no different.

Those who believe that they entitled to sit in the higher room will be disappointed.

Those whom the Bride and Bridegroom recognise will be invited to go up higher.

[PAUSE]

The more we value Jesus, the less we value the entitlements of this life. The more we learn to approach Him in reverence at His altar, and the more we learn to take Him away with us in our hearts, in our minds and in our lives, the less we need for the trappings of pride and reputation.

We are entitled to Heaven, but only through the love of Christ.

Celebrating length of service

 

Why liturgy should take as long as it takes.

Bishop Apparent

Sermon for the 18th anniversary of Consecration of Bishop Damien Mead

Mitre, purple cassock, 

rochet, chimere, pectoral cross.

All items of apparel 

exclusive to a bishop.

Why on earth would anyone

long to wear them?

And yet some people do.

[PAUSE]

Look out on the street,

and you see people walking about.

They don't tend to stand out. 

Coats and hats, 

hoodies and jeans,

smart suits and scruffy tracksuits.

But a man

coming down the street

in a cope and mitre

seems rather odd.

Conspicuous,

attention-grabbing,

silly.

The dress of a bishop 

is distinctive

and indicative of

an authority

that comes down

through the ages.

It has a place

and that place is the church.

Indeed, where the people

gather around their bishop,

there is the Catholic Church.

The office of a bishop

is attractive to Christians

for this reason.

But can we be sure

that when we see

a man dressed as a bishop

that we see the Catholic Church?

[PAUSE]

Of course not!

An actor can dress as a bishop,

that doesn't mean that

he has the authority of a bishop.

Anyone,

man or woman,

can dress as a bishop

but only those who are truly

consecrated by the Church

are truly bishops.

And some people

long to dress as bishops

for that sense of authority

because they hope people

will listen to them

and give them some sense of respect.

These people

dress as bishops for themselves.

They desire the appearance 

of a bishop,

not the office of a bishop.

[PAUSE]

St Paul tells us

that to desire the office of a bishop

is a good thing.

To want to do

what bishops do

is something holy.

But not all are called

to do that.

Only those whom

God calls

and the Church recognises

in keeping with the authority

and teaching she has received

from Christ.

The first bishops

did not look like bishops

but they were bishops

setting the pattern for ours today.

The distinctive dress

of bishops may develop

over the ages,

but all bishops

possess the same, 

unchanging authority.

There is only One

Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church,

united across Time and Space,

and the bishops 

are an integral ingredient

of what it means for

the Church to be

Apostolic.

[PAUSE]

And we have a bishop,

and we are gathered 

around that bishop 

in order to do what the Church

has always done.

At the hands of our bishop,

we offer the Sacrifice of the Mass,

the same sacrifice

that the Church has always offered,

and we receive at His hands

the true Body and Blood

of Our Lord Jesus Christ.

This makes us members

of that One, Holy, Catholic

and Apostolic Church.

[PAUSE]

Of courss,

there will always be those

who say that

we are actors.

They will say that

our bishop is playing dress-up -

cosplaying.

They will say

that we are not really 

doing what we think we're doing.

They will say

that we do not

really have bishops

because we changed 

what bishops are.

But we haven't!

What do they think

we are doing?

Cosplay!

Okay, but why?

For what reason?

Why are you here today?

Why is our bishop here today?

We are here

in faith

to worship God in our Lord Jesus Christ

and offer the sacrifice of the Mass

according to the rites of Holy Church

and we intend 

to receive the Body and Blood of Christ.

Just as we intend 

to consecrate bishops

according to 

the One, Holy, Catholic 

and Apostolic Church

through the grace of God.

That is our intention.

It has always been our intention,

through 1054,

through 1534,

through 1992.

"Ah, you might intend it,

but it's not really happening,

is it?"

God will judge our intentions

and not men.

We will not force people

to receive from our bishops.

We will not insist 

that people accept our authority.

For Love does not insist

on His own way.

Let those who don't believe us

go their way in peace.

But as many as will have faith

and accept the ministry

and authority of our bishop,

these will receive

the fulness of 

the One, Holy,.Catholic

and Apostolic Church.

[PAUSE]

And to our bishop

who does the office of a bishop

rather than just 

looking like a bishop.

Thank you.

And 

Thank God.

Anglican Catholic Equivocation?

 

Does love mean love?

Perspectives of Mammon

Sermon for the fifteenth Sunday after Trinity

Does Our Lord really not understand mortgages?

We need to think about how we are going to pay off our debts otherwise, we will be homeless.

If we don’t spend some time thinking about which secondary school our child needs to go to, then they will end up somewhere horrid.

If we don’t think about that presentation for work, we will lose our jobs.

So, for Our Lord to tell us not to take any thought for tomorrow is rather more worrying, especially when it suggests that, if we do take thought for tomorrow, we’re not really displaying faith in God Who loves us and provides for us.

Surely, we do need to plan for the future. Surely, we need to think about pensions, and mortgages and payslips and what we are going to eat.

Our Lord suggests that being anxious for the future is almost a sin.

[PAUSE]

Anxiety is rife in our modern society. More and more people are being treated for anxiety, especially since the economic turbulence started twenty years ago and exacerbated some four years ago. Couple that with the political situations, the wars and rumours of wars. Surely, we do need to think forward.

And isn’t the Lord being a little inconsistent? If the five foolish virgins had the presence of mind to fill their lamps well before the bridegroom came, as He tells us, surely they would have entered into the feast with the five wise virgins.

What’s the problem? Where have things gone wrong?

[PAUSE]

Our Lord reminds us of the two masters: God and Mammon. They are entirely contradictory but only one is the Creator. What actually is Mammon, then?

Many people have thought that Mammon is actually a demon sent to tempt those prone to avarice. In fact, Mammon is just a Aramaic personification of wealth. The word is just used in the same way that we would talk about Death as the Grim Reaper or Love as being a chubby cherub bearing a bow and arrow. Mammon is an idea, a meme. It simply focuses the mind on our concepts of wealth and riches.

Our Lord is contrasting two influences in our lives. One is God our Father seeking to love us and to share His good things with us – His good things, not the things we think are good. The other is Mammon, Wealth, Riches, the sparkling mountain of gold upon which lurks Smaug the dragon. Mammon is what we think good things are, and we think that they are good irrespective of whether they are actually good.

Mammon arises when we make the decision as to what is good for us rather than rely on God Whose very nature tells us what is good for us.

[PAUSE]

The trouble is that we live in a society in which material things are shoved in our face. Every advertisement promises us something good. Every security system is a testament to the evil robbers who seek to steal our wealth. Every bank is encouraging us to invest our money into computer systems that have made our wealth invisible and susceptible to instant deletion by a strategic power cut. Even our banknotes are IOUs – “I promise to pay the bearer…”

Our anxiety is heightened when we can’t see our riches for what they are. In fact, the world around actively wants us to be unable for us to see our riches for what they are. The world does not want the spell of Mammon to be broken so that, while we worry about what we have and what we don’t, we can be controlled through delight and through dread.

Our Lord urges us to see the better path.

[PAUSE]

First, we are urged to grow in faith. This takes time, but Our Lord tells us that even a grain of faith makes a difference. We are to look to God as the source of what we need. Yes, we have mortgages, investments, pensions, and debts, and He knows that. He doesn’t ask that we forget that, nor live irresponsibly, but rather to focus on Him.

Second, we are urged to see God as the source of what is really good, not our belly. The beauty of Lent and Advent, as well as the Ember Days, is that days of fasting are our opportunity to gain control over our own bodies and to look for what is truly nourishing. Riches will not buy our way into Heaven. Indeed, we shall spend seventy, eighty, ninety years on this earth and Eternity somewhere else, preferably in the Kingdom of God.

Third, we are urged to focus on God’s love for us. Anxiety is real and growing, but the more people see that there is hope, security and joy in the Church, the more they can put their problems into a better perspective. The more active love we can show people, the more they can realise that even in the worst-case scenario, there is true hope, justice and resolution. Anxiety might be seen as a lack of faith in God. In truth it is a loss of perspective which we can regain by struggling through hardship and worry to the realisation that God truly is in control.

We, the Church have a duty to love people and give assistance where we can so that this grip of Mammon can be loosened.

[PAUSE]

Easier said than done?

Possibly, but the grip of our economy is rooted in Mammon, one way or another. We cannot serve two masters, and so we need to learn to serve only one. That is going to take time. This is why our salvation is not a one-off event but a life-long struggle against Mammon as well as the other temptations. It is part of our life’s walk with Christ to disengage from worrying about material things that are ultimately immaterial. It takes work, prayer, silence and love.

It’s not as if we don’t have a reason to worry, but rather that this reason needs perspective and only the perspective of Almighty God will do.

 

How important are birthdays?

 

Do we really have to celebrate our birthday?

Priests, lepers and rubber stamps

Sermon preached at the Cathedral Church of St Augustine of Canterbury on the fourteenth Sunday after Trinity

Why is the tenth leper so good?

Just because 

he comes back 

to glorify Jesus? 

Is that all?

Where are the other nine?

Doing what they are told to do!

They have been told 

to show themselves 

to the priests.

That is what they are doing!

Only the Samaritan turns back.

If anything, 

this Samaritan leper 

is being disobedient.

He's not doing 

what Our Lord tells him.

And he is praised for it!

[PAUSE]

Why does Our Lord 

send the lepers to the priests 

in the first place?

This is standard Jewish practice. 

Lepers are not permitted 

to be part of Society 

on the grounds of their 

contagious disease. 

That's a standard practice 

and we do it even today! 

Think of the self-isolation 

that we do when we have COVID. 

Of course with leprosy, 

or whatever skin disease these ten men have,

 it stays contagious for longer. 

In order to re-enter Jewish society, 

a (hopefully former) leper 

has to show himself 

to the priests 

who administer their own tests 

to see whether he is free 

from the disease.

Let's be clear on this: 

in order to be able to re-enter society, 

it is the priests that need 

to declare a man clean. 

The person with the disease 

doesn't get to say, "I'm all betfer!" 

Even if everyone can see 

that there are 

no more spots or lesions 

on his body, 

only the priest can say 

whether a man is free 

from the disease.

It's the priest who holds 

the rubber stamps marked 

"clean" and "unclean".

[PAUSE]

So the ten lepers 

go their way and, 

on the way, 

they are healed.

But the nine Jewish lepers 

won't know that 

until they are seen 

by the priests. 

Even if they say, 

"ooh I suddenly feel better!" 

or "gosh, Gerald! 

You don't look blotchy any more!" 

they can't say that 

they are healed 

until they have seen the priests.

And here's the thing.

The priests don't heal them.

It's not they who are making 

the disease go away. 

They are just declaring a fact.

These men are healed 

through a distinct action 

of God Himself.

And one man, 

the Samaritan, 

sees it for what it is.

[PAUSE]

For someone as hated 

as the Samaritan, 

it's entirely possible 

that the priests 

will not declare him clean, 

just because he is a Samaritan.

But that's not fair.

He is clean.

He does not need 

the Jewish Law 

to tell him that.

It is not the Jewish Law 

that saves him.

It is Christ.

And he sees 

and turns back 

to the One Who has done this, 

Who has made him.healthy again. 

This man is in utter joy 

at knowing 

the Source of his healing 

and turns to worship Him.

And a few years after this, 

a faithful Jew, 

a great Pharisee, 

full of the knowledge 

of the Law and the prophets 

will see exactly the same thing.

[PAUSE]

St Paul comes 

to the same 

God-given revelation 

as this former leper. 

We are not saved 

by what the Jewish Law 

does for us. 

Law can only tell us 

whether we are 

right or wrong, 

clean or unclean, 

fit for Society or unfit for Society. 

It is not by doing 

the works of the Law 

that makes us right with God. 

We are not justified by works of the Law.

"Thy faith hath made thee whole."

The leper is cleansed 

and made whole 

by Our Lord 

because he has faith 

in Our Lord 

and acts on this faith. 

We, too, are justified 

- made whole, 

made right with God, 

but not by faith alone 

rather by a faith acting 

in obedience, 

in harmony,

in co-operation

not with a Law which cannot save, 

but with Christ Who does save.

In this miracle, 

Our Lord is completely respecting 

the integrity of the Law 

by telling the lepers to obey it.

Yet, through the faith of one man 

we are shown that

it is the Christ that saves, 

not the Law.

[PAUSE]

Our healing,

our salvation,

comes from presenting 

ourselves to Christ

as we are,

all fractures, foibles

and fallibilities.

And then, 

we hear the voice of Our Lady,

"Do whatever He tells you."

And we do that

with faith in Him

and in that faith

we find His healing for us

which begins with Eternal life.

That is salvation.

That is His promise.

That is our hope and joy.